You're currently signed in as:
User

AURORA M. GUIANG v. ATTY. LEONARDO B. ANTONIO

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2007-11-23
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
In cases involving a lawyer's failure to file a brief or other pleadings before an appellate court, we did not hesitate to suspend the erring member of the Bar from the practice of law for three months,[25] six months,[26] or even disbarment in severely aggravated cases.[27]
2005-02-18
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In Barbuco v. Atty. Beltran, Guiang v. Atty. Antonio,[26] and Sps. Villaluz v. Judge Armenta,[27] the Court suspended counsel for six months upon a finding that their failure to perfect an appeal was inexcusable and persuasively demonstrative of negligence and malpractice, a violation of Rule 18.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility which declares that "a lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him and his negligence in connection therewith shall render him liable."
2004-07-30
TINGA, J,
Rule 18.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides that "a lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him and his negligence in connection therewith shall render him liable."   Hence, the Court, in Guiang v. Antonio[20] and Villaluz v. Armenta,[21]  suspended lawyers from the practice of law for failing to appeal their respective client's cases within the prescribed period.  These cases are squarely applicable herein.