This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2006-08-10 |
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J. |
||||
| I am aware that following the Court's 1993 ruling in People v. Pineda,[45] double jeopardy will not attach unless either the RTC or the court-martial passes sentence on the petitioners. Yet even applying the Pineda doctrine, it is inevitable that, once either tribunal renders judgment on the merits, double jeopardy would bar the further prosecution by the court which was last in time to pronounce sentence, regardless whether petitioners were convicted or acquitted. If both the RTC trial for coup d'etat and the court-martial of the petitioners are allowed to proceed unhampered, the strong likelihood arises that either one will be eventually mooted, no matter the stage, should the other pronounce sentence. | |||||
|
2003-07-03 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| On 10 May 1976, the Register of Deeds of Cebu City cancelled TCT No. 44204 in the name of the Estate of Jose Vaño covering Lot No. 5 and issued a new title, TCT No. 64522, in the name of Alfredo Loy, Jr. and Perfeccion V. Loy.[24] Likewise, on the same date, the Register of Deeds cancelled TCT No. 44205 in the name of the Estate of Jose Vaño covering Lot No. 6, and issued TCT No. 64523 in the name of Teresita A. Loy.[25] | |||||