This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-12-15 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| Thus, in Reyes v. Court of Appeals,[28] the Court held: Finally, we rule that the trial court did not err when it favorably considered the affidavits of Eufrocina and Efren Tecson (Annexes "B" and "C") although the affiants were not presented and subjected to cross-examination. Section 16 of P.D. No. 946 provides that `Rules of Court shall not be applicable in agrarian cases even in a suppletory character.' The same provision states that `In the hearing, investigation and determination of any question or controversy, affidavits and counter-affidavits may be allowed and are admissible in evidence.'[29] | |||||