Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 150301 2007-10-02	PHILIPPINE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. CA AZCUNA, J.
Two, as a reclaimed land, the port complex should be considered a reserved land. In NDC v. Cebu City,[16] the Supreme Court held that a reserved land is a public land that has been withheld or kept back from sale or disposition. The land remains an absolute property of the government. As its title remains with the State, the reserved land is tax exempt;
	GR NO. 154028 2005-08-29	PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL v. CIR QUISUMBING, J.
Under the principle of solutio indebiti,[18] the government has to restore to petitioner the sums representing erroneous payments of taxes.[19] It is of no moment whether NPC had already reimbursed petitioner or not because in this case, there should have been no VAT paid at all.
	GR No. 154028 2005-07-29	PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL v. CIR QUISUMBING, J.
Under the principle of solutio indebiti,[18] the government has to restore to petitioner the sums representing erroneous payments of taxes.[19] It is of no moment whether NPC had already reimbursed petitioner or not because in this case, there should have been no VAT paid at all.