Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

ANGUSTIA M. IBAY v. CA

This case has been cited 7 times or more.

	A M No. CA-01-32 2002-01-23	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. JUSTICES DEMETRIO G. DEMETRIA PARDO, J.
On March 23, 1998, Manila Builders filed with the Court of Appeals a petition for certiorari and mandamus questioning the regional trial court's "sub-silencio" denial of its application for injunctive relief.[9]
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
The cases before the Court are consolidated petitions for review on certiorari to nullify: (1) the decision of the Court of Appeals[1] setting aside that of the Metropolitan Trial Court, Pasay City, Branch 45[2] and the orders of the Regional Trial Court, Pasay City branch 231[3] , and ordering petitioners to restore the subject property to the possession of respondent MMB, Inc. until the expiration of the lease contract, and (2) the resolution of the Court of Appeals[4] allowing execution pending appeal[5] of its aforesaid decision and issuing a writ of execution[6] depriving petitioners of possession of the leased property and giving its possession to respondent MMB, Inc.[7] which was a deforciant and worse, declaring petitioners guilty of indirect contempt of court and sentencing them to pay a fine of P30,000.00. The factual background of the case dates back to November 30, 1976. Brothers Justice Jose Benedicto Luna Reyes (also known as Justice J. B. L. Reyes) and Dr. Edmundo A. Reyes were co-owners of a parcel of land located at Taft Avenue, Pasay City, near Buendia, with a land area
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
dismiss.[24] In an attempt to dramatize its plea, on March 23, 1998, respondent MMB, Inc. filed another petition with the Court of Appeals[25] , for certiorari and mandamus complaining about what it termed as the sub-silencio denial by the lower
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
1998, respondent MMB, Inc. filed with the Court of Appeals a motion for leave of court to admit a supplemental petition.[34] On May 18, 1998, respondent MMB, Inc. filed with the Court of Appeals an urgent motion for the issuance of another temporary restraining order in the second CA case.[35] Respondent sought a TRO to enjoin the MTC-Branch 45, Pasay City from enforcing the
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
City enjoining the writ of execution issued in Civil Case No. 113-97, to desist from proceeding with CA-G. R. SP No. 47158, to declare the order of respondent judge in Civil Case No. 98-0366 as null and void for being issued in grave abuse of discretion, without or in excess of its jurisdiction, and to declare the TRO/injunction permanent. On May 22, 1998, the Court of Appeals consolidated the second[39] and third[40] CA cases.
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
On August 31, 1998, petitioners filed with the Court of Appeals a motion requesting for an extension of time to file explanation on the motion to declare petitioners and counsel in contempt.[50] In a resolution dated September 3, 1998, the Court of
	GR Nos. 135180-81; 135425-26 2000-08-16	HEIRS OF LATE JUSTICE JOSE B. L. REYES v. CA PARDO, J.
On September 21, 1998, the Court of Appeals designated a special sheriff[57] to enforce the writ, and on the same day, he evicted petitioners from the premises and restored possession in favor of private respondent.[58]