This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2011-09-14 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| On June 15, 1992, the Sandiganbayan issued a Resolution[25] dismissing Civil Case No. 0142 without prejudice to the re-filing of the proper motions in Civil Case No. 0008. Civil Case No. 0142 was dismissed allegedly because the issues are intimately related with those raised in Civil Case No. 0008 such that the resolution of the issues raised in the former might render inutile or nugatory any future determination and resolution of the merits of the causes of action in the latter case. TDFSI's motion for reconsideration was likewise denied on September 23, 1992.[26] | |||||
|
2007-09-14 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| The general rule is that when a judgment has been satisfied, it passes beyond review, satisfaction being the last act and the end of the proceedings, and payment or satisfaction of the obligation thereby established produces permanent and irrevocable discharge; hence, a judgment debtor who acquiesces to and voluntarily complies with the judgment is estopped from taking an appeal therefrom.[21] | |||||