This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2011-09-17 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| There is intimidation when one of the parties is compelled by a reasonable and well-grounded fear of an imminent and grave evil upon his person or property, or upon the person or property of his spouse, descendants or ascendants, to give his consent. [44] Material violence is not indispensable for there to be intimidation. Intense fear produced in the mind of the victim which restricts or hinders the exercise of the will is sufficient.[45] | |||||
|
2009-02-10 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| Intimidation is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as unlawful coercion; extortion; duress; putting in fear.[40] In robbery with intimidation of persons, the intimidation consists in causing or creating fear in the mind of a person or in bringing in a sense of mental distress in view of a risk or evil that may be impending, real or imagined. Such fear of injury to person or property must continue to operate in the mind of the victim at the time of the delivery of the money.[41] | |||||