You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ARTURO G. EUDELA v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 137566
2001-02-28
ROBERTO G. ROSALES v. CA
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
As such, the period to appeal should be reckoned from service of the said amendatory Order. Where a judgment is amended, the date of the amendment should be considered the date of the decision in the computation of the period for perfecting the appeal.[22] For all intents and purposes, the lower court rendered a new judgment from which the time to appeal must be reckoned.[23]