You're currently signed in as:
User

FIRST MALAYAN LEASING v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2004-09-20
CORONA, J.
In synthesis, we hold that the registered owner, the defendant-appellant herein, is primarily responsible for the damage caused to the vehicle of the plaintiff-appellee, but he (defendant-appellant) hasĀ  a right to be indemnified by the real or actual owner of the amount that he may be required to pay as damage for the injury caused to the plaintiff-appellant.[8] Petitioner insists that he is not liable for damages since the driver of the vehicle at the time of the accident was not an authorized driver of the new (actual) owner of the vehicle. He claims that the ruling in First Malayan Leasing and Finance Corporation vs. CA[9] implies that to hold the registered owner liable for damages, the driver of the vehicle must have been authorized, allowed and permitted by its actual owner to operate and drive it. Thus, if the vehicle is driven without the knowledge and consent of the actual owner, then the registered owner cannot be held liable for damages.