This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2001-12-04 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
Petitioner asserts further that respondents cannot impugn her filiation collaterally, citing the case of Sayson v. Court of Appeals[12] in which we held that "(t)he legitimacy of (a) child can be impugned only in a direct action brought for that purpose, by the proper parties and within the period limited by law."[13] Petitioner also cites Article 263 of the Civil Code in support of this contention.[14] |