Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 183804 2013-09-11	S.C. MEGAWORLD CONSTRUCTION v. ENGR. LUIS U. PARADA REYES, J.
It is settled that other than in the case of judgments which are void ab initio for lack of jurisdiction, or which are null and void per se, and thus may be questioned at any time, when a decision is final, even the court which issued it can no longer alter or modify it, except to correct clerical errors or mistakes.[46]
	GR No. 143781 2002-02-27	JOSE CLAVANO v. HOUSING AND LAND USE REGULATORY BOARD AND SPS. ENRIQUE AND VENUS TENAZAS BELLOSILLO, J.
It was ill advised for private respondents to have failed to include in their pleadings before the HLURB the appropriate allegations which would have formed (legitimately, that is) the basis for an order in the 14 November 1995 HLURB Decision compelling petitioner to defray such expenses. In Heirs of Remigio Tan v. Intermediate Appellate Court[38] where after the judgment had become final and executory the heirs sought to limit their liability for the debts of the decedent to the extent only of their inheritance from him, we ruled -