You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

HEIRS OF FRANCISCO GUBALLA v. CA AND SPS. RUFINO B. RISMA AND TECLA GOTICO-RISMA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR NO. 143312
2005-08-12
RICARDO S. SILVERIO v. FILIPINO BUSINESS CONSULTANTS
CARPIO, J.
Moreover, it is the court issuing the writ of possession that has control and supervision over its processes.[24] The RTC Balayan can therefore hear the evidence on the existence of a supervening event, provided the subject matter is within the jurisdiction of the court, as this could affect the execution of the writ of possession.