Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 143111 2007-06-07	LORETO REYES v. SPS. HONORIO AND JOSEFINA B. JOSON SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
All the above elements must concur in order to create a tenancy relationship. The absence of one does not make an occupant of a parcel of land, a cultivator or a planter thereon, a de jure tenant. It is only when an individual has established his status as a de jure tenant that he is entitled to security of tenure and would thus come under the coverage of existing tenancy laws.[5]
	GR No. 122363 2003-04-29	VICTOR G. VALENCIA v. CA BELLOSILLO, J.
In Caballes v. DAR[40] the Court held that all these requisites must concur in order to create a tenancy relationship. The absence of one does not make an occupant or a cultivator thereof or a planter thereon a de jure tenant. This is so because unless a person has established his status as a de jure tenant he is not entitled to security of tenure nor is he covered by the Land Reform Program of the Government under existing tenancy laws.[41]