You're currently signed in as:
User

AYER PRODUCTIONS PTY. LTD. v. IGNACIO M. CAPULONG

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2005-09-30
TINGA, J.
figures.  In Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. v. Capulong,[71] the Court cited with approval the following definition of a public figure propounded by an American textbook on torts:A public figure has been defined as a person who, by his accomplishments, fame, or mode of living, or by adopting a profession or calling which gives the public a legitimate interest in his doings, his affairs, and his character, has become a 'public personage.' He is, in other words, a celebrity. Obviously to be included in this category are those who have achieved some degree of reputation by appearing before the public, as in the case of an actor, a professional baseball player, a pugilist, or any other entertainer. The list is, however, broader than this. It includes public officers, famous inventors and explorers, war heroes and even ordinary soldiers, an infant prodigy, and no less a personage than the Grand Exalted Ruler of a lodge. It includes, in short, anyone who has arrived at a position where public attention is focused upon him as a person.[72]