This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-01-28 |
DAVIDE, JR., C.J. |
||||
| It should be stressed in this connection that the absence of a written contract will not preclude the finding that there was a professional relationship that justifies the collection of attorney's fees for professional services rendered. Documentary formalism is not an essential element in the employment of an attorney; the contract may be express or implied. To establish the relation, it is sufficient that the advice and assistance of an attorney is sought and received in any matter pertinent to his profession.[16] Hence, with or without a contingency agreement between the complainants and the respondent, the trial court must determine the propriety of respondent's claim for attorney's fees and the reasonable amount thereof. | |||||