This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-04-12 |
PUNO, J. |
||||
| (1) Temporary total disability lasting continuously for more than one hundred twenty days, except as otherwise provided in the Rules; x x x Petitioner likewise cites Vicente v. ECC[35] and Abaya, Jr. v. ECC,[36] both of which were decided applying the Labor Code provisions on disability benefits. Private respondents, on the other hand, contend that petitioner erred in applying the definition of "permanent total disability" under the Labor Code and cases decided under the ECC as the instant case involves a contractual claim under the 1996 POEA SEC. | |||||