You're currently signed in as:
User

ATTY. ARTURO A. ROMERO v. JUDGE GABRIEL O. VALLE

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2015-04-22
PERALTA, J.
The issuance of the title, however, became the subject of a Protest by Angelina Bustamante (now deceased),[3] the wife of Marcelo Bustamante (also deceased), before the then Director of Lands.[4] The ground of the protest was the title's alleged encroachment on the area subject of Marcelo's own patent application.[5]
2005-12-13
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
(2)  The State shall likewise recognize and apply a true value system that takes into account social and environmental cost implications relative to the utilization, development and conservation of our natural resources. The above provision stresses "the necessity of maintaining a sound ecological balance and protecting and enhancing the quality of the environment."[46] (Emphasis ours.) In sum, the Administrative Code of 1987 and Executive Order No. 192 entrust the DENR with the guardianship and safekeeping of the Marikina Watershed Reservation and our other natural treasures.  However, although the DENR, an agency of the government, owns the Marikina Reserve and has jurisdiction over the same, this power is not absolute, but is defined by the declared policies of the state, and is subject to the law and higher authority.  Section 2, Title XIV, Book IV of the Administrative Code of 1987, while specifically referring to the mandate of the DENR, makes particular reference to the agency's being subject to law and higher authority, thus:SEC. 2.  Mandate. - (1) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall be primarily responsible for the implementation of the foregoing policy.