This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-06-03 |
SERENO, C.J. |
||||
| Factual findings of administrative bodies like the CSC are binding on this Court, unless these findings are not supported by substantial evidence.[72] In this case, we rule that the findings of fact and conclusions of the CSC have passed the test of substantiality. It is sufficient that administrative findings of fact are supported by the evidence on record; or, stated negatively, it is sufficient that findings of fact are not shown to be unsupported by evidence.[73] The absence of substantial evidence is not shown by stressing that there is contrary evidence on record, whether direct or circumstantial.[74] | |||||