You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

GENEROSO TRIESTE v. SANDIGANBAYAN

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR Nos. 137355-58
2007-09-25
EUGENIO U. CABALLERO v. SANDIGANBAYAN
GARCIA, J.
Worth citing is the case of Trieste, Sr. v. Sandiganbayan[16] where the Court clarified the kind of intervention that would constitute a violation of Section 3(h) of RA No. 3019:What is contemplated in Section 3(h) of the Anti-Graft Law is the actual intervention in the transaction in which one has financial or pecuniary interest in order that liability may attach. For the law aims to prevent dominant use of influence, authority and power. (Emphasis supplied.)