Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR NO. 157745 2006-09-26	GENALYN D. YOUNG v. SPS. MANUEL SY AND VICTORIA SY AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
THE SUPERVENING EVENT WHICH IS THE CONSOLIDATION OF TITLE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE NAME OF MANUEL SY, OCCURRED AFTER 21 JUNE 2000; SUCH DATE IS PLAINLY SUBSEQUENT TO THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT ON 02 MAY 2000.[5] On November 18, 2002, the CA promulgated its Decision denying the Petition for Certiorari and Mandamus and held that the cause of action of the petitioner in the Supplemental Complaint is entirely different from the original complaint; that the Supplemental Complaint did not merely supply its deficiencies; and that, at any rate, in the event the trial court issues an adverse ruling, the petitioner can still appeal the same, hence, the petition under Rule 65 is not proper.