This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-02-24 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Prudential Bank v. Castro[264] was an administrative case spawned by a party's complaint, wherein the Court, in light of the surrounding circumstances, found that the judge committed serious and grave misfeasance because the issuance of the orders and ill-conceived summary judgment showed the judge's partiality to, or confabulation with the plaintiff and its lawyers. | |||||