You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. ALBERTO OPIDA Y QUIAMBAO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2014-04-29
PERALTA, J.
No specific type of proof is required to show that there was demand.[10] Demand need not even be formal; it may be verbal.[11] The specific word "demand" need not even be used to show that it has indeed been made upon the person charged, since even a mere query as to the whereabouts of the money [in this case, property], would be tantamount to a demand.[12]  As expounded in Asejo v. People:[13]