This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-08-26 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| In Lebin v. Mirasol,[45] the Court has discussed the justification for requiring the record on appeal in appeals in special proceedings, viz.: The changes and clarifications recognize that appeal is neither a natural nor a constitutional right, but merely statutory, and the implication of its statutory character is that the party who intends to appeal must always comply with the procedures and rules governing appeals, or else the right of appeal may be lost or squandered. | |||||
|
2013-06-26 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| The right to appeal is a statutory right, not a natural nor a constitutional right. The party who intends to appeal must comply with the procedures and rules governing appeals; otherwise, the right of appeal may be lost or squandered.[15] Contrary to Go's assertion, his appeal was not denied on a mere technicality. "The perfection of an appeal in the manner and within the period permitted by law is not only mandatory, but jurisdictional, and the failure to perfect that appeal renders the judgment of the court final and executory."[16] | |||||