You're currently signed in as:
User

VIOLA CAHILIG v. EUSTAQUIO G. TERENCIO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2014-10-13
PEREZ, J.
The Answer submitted by the heirs of Juan, as well as the testimony of Juan constitute judicial admissions. Well-settled is the rule that a judicial admission conclusively binds the party making it. He cannot thereafter take a position contradictory to, or inconsistent with his pleadings. Acts or facts admitted do not require proof and cannot be contradicted unless it is shown that the admission was made through palpable mistake or that no such admission was made.[24]