This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2006-07-20 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| In fact, MIAA itself believes that it is a GOCC represents itself as such. It said so itself in the very first paragraph of the present petition before this Court.[97] So does, apparently, the Department of Budget and Management, which classifies MIAA as a "government owned & controlled corporation" on its internet website.[98] There is also the matter of Executive Order No. 483, which evinces the belief of the then-president of the Philippines that MIAA is a GOCC. And the Court before had similarly characterized MIAA as a government-owned and controlled corporation in the earlier MIAA case, Manila International Airport Authority v. Commission on Audit.[99] | |||||
|
2004-12-01 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| The Charter of the Manila International Airport Authority,[19] as amended by Executive Order No. 903,[20] states that:SEC. 17. Increase or Decrease of Rates. The Authority may increase or decrease the rates of the dues, charges, fees or assessments collectible by the Authority to protect the interest of the Government and provide a satisfactory return on the Authority's assets, and may adjust the schedule of such rates so as to reflect the cost of facilities or services provided or rendered. The Authority may periodically review all dues, charges, fees or assessments collectible by the Authority, and shall make such adjustments to the schedule of rates as shall adequately reflect any increase in price levels and (in the case of concession rental) of volume of traffic through the Airport, subject to the provisions of Batas Pambansa Blg. 325, whenever practicable. (Underscoring supplied.) | |||||
|
2003-05-05 |
PUNO, J. |
||||
| In fine, the efficient functioning of NAIA IPT III is imbued with public interest. The provisions of the 1997 Concession Agreement and the ARCA did not strip government, thru the MIAA, of its right to supervise the operation of the whole NAIA complex, including NAIA IPT III. As the primary government agency tasked with the job,[79] it is MIAA's responsibility to ensure that whoever by contract is given the right to operate NAIA IPT III will do so within the bounds of the law and with due regard to the rights of third parties and above all, the interest of the public. | |||||
|
2003-02-14 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| There is likewise no basis for K Services' contention that its services as the porterage contractor cannot be terminated unless a public bidding is held to determine its replacement. MIAA's charter, as provided for in Executive Order No. 903, grants the MIAA ample authority to take over directly porterage operations within the airport.[31] Against this law, K Services' claims of verbal assurances from MIAA's officers cannot prevail. | |||||