You're currently signed in as:
User

TRADE UNIONS OF PHILIPPINES v. AMADO G. INCIONG

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2004-07-27
CARPIO, J.
Unlike in Ferrer, there is also insufficient evidence in the records to verify at this time petitioner's allegations that RTC-Branch 138, the City Treasurer and Register of Deeds of Parañaque failed to observe the legal requirements of notice and due process on tax sales of real property.  Worse, petitioner anchors many of his arguments assailing the public auction of the Property on the outmoded Assessment Law of 1939.[52] Presidential Decree No. 464 had long superseded the Assessment Law, which was no longer the applicable law when the tax sale of the Property took place in 1982.[53]
2004-07-27
CARPIO, J.
Unlike in Ferrer, there is also insufficient evidence in the records to verify at this time petitioner's allegations that RTC-Branch 138, the City Treasurer and Register of Deeds of Parañaque failed to observe the legal requirements of notice and due process on tax sales of real property.  Worse, petitioner anchors many of his arguments assailing the public auction of the Property on the outmoded Assessment Law of 1939.[52] Presidential Decree No. 464 had long superseded the Assessment Law, which was no longer the applicable law when the tax sale of the Property took place in 1982.[53]