You're currently signed in as:
User

ALEJANDRO A. LICHAUCO v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2010-07-07
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
This section is derived from the former Section 2, Rule 12, which then provided that the motion to intervene may be filed "before or during a trial."  Said former phraseology gave rise to ambiguous doctrines on the interpretation of the word "trial," with one decision holding that said Motion may be filed up to the day the case is submitted for decision,[30] while another stating that it may be filed at any time before the rendition of the final judgment.[31]  This ambiguity was eliminated by the present Section 2, Rule 19 by clearly stating that the same may be filed "at any time before rendition of the judgment by the trial court," in line with the second doctrine above-stated.  The clear import of the amended provision is that intervention cannot be allowed when the trial court has already rendered its Decision, and much less, as in the case at bar, when even the Court of Appeals had rendered its own Decision on appeal.