This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-08-03 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| The Court of Appeals Twelfth Division, in a Decision[13] penned by Court of Appeals Associate Justice Elvi John Asuncion,[14] partially granted Philcemcor's petition. The appellate court ruled that it had jurisdiction over the petition for certiorari since it alleged grave abuse of discretion. While it refused to annul the findings of the Tariff Commission,[15] it also held that the DTI Secretary was not bound by the factual findings of the Tariff Commission since such findings are merely recommendatory and they fall within the ambit of the Secretary's discretionary review. It determined that the legislative intent is to grant the DTI Secretary the power to make a final decision on the Tariff Commission's recommendation.[16] | |||||