You're currently signed in as:
User

RUFO QUEMUEL v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2014-04-29
PERALTA, J.
The factual findings of the appellate court generally are conclusive, and carry even more weight when said court affirms the findings of the trial court, absent any showing that the findings are totally devoid of support in the records, or that they are so glaringly erroneous as to constitute grave abuse of discretion.[4]  Petitioner is of the opinion that the CA erred in affirming the factual findings of the trial court.  He now comes to this Court raising both procedural and substantive issues.