Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 205357 2014-09-02	GMA NETWORK v. COMELEC PERALTA, J.
On the other hand, respondent posits in its Comment and Opposition[13] dated March 8, 2013, that the petition should be denied based on the following reasons: Respondent contends that the remedies of certiorari and prohibition are not available to petitioners, because the writ of certiorari is only available against the COMELEC's adjudicatory or quasi-judicial powers, while the writ of prohibition only lies against the exercise of judicial, quasi-judicial or ministerial functions. Said writs do not lie against the COMELEC's administrative or rule-making powers.