Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

FILIPINO PIPE v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 130876 2003-12-05	FRANCISCO ALONSO v. CEBU COUNTRY CLUB AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Liao, which was penned by Justice Pardo, who also penned the Decision in this case, is however different. Upon petition of Estrella Mapa, the RTC of Quezon City, acting as a land court, ordered the reconstitution of certain titles covering Friar Lands lots which were allegedly lost. It turned out that the reconstituted titles were in conflict with existing titles. This resulted in the filing of petitions[69] in the Court of Appeals for the annulment of the order of reconstitution against Mapa and her lot purchasers. It was followed by complaints before the RTC of Quezon City, seeking the quieting of title and an NBI investigation into the matter. In due time, the RTC branches concerned rendered their decisions, nullifying the reconstituted titles and titles derived therefrom.[70] On separate appeals interposed by Liao, who in the meantime purchased the lots from Mapa's buyers, the Court of Appeals through two Divisions[71] rendered decisions affirming the judgments of the Quezon City courts. The decisions of the Court of Appeals in turn were brought up to this Court. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals granted the petition for annulment of judgment.[72] The decision was also elevated to this Court. After the consolidation of the petitions, this Court rendered the Liao decision.
	GR No. 130876 2003-12-05	FRANCISCO ALONSO v. CEBU COUNTRY CLUB AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Liao, which was penned by Justice Pardo, who also penned the Decision in this case, is however different. Upon petition of Estrella Mapa, the RTC of Quezon City, acting as a land court, ordered the reconstitution of certain titles covering Friar Lands lots which were allegedly lost. It turned out that the reconstituted titles were in conflict with existing titles. This resulted in the filing of petitions[69] in the Court of Appeals for the annulment of the order of reconstitution against Mapa and her lot purchasers. It was followed by complaints before the RTC of Quezon City, seeking the quieting of title and an NBI investigation into the matter. In due time, the RTC branches concerned rendered their decisions, nullifying the reconstituted titles and titles derived therefrom.[70] On separate appeals interposed by Liao, who in the meantime purchased the lots from Mapa's buyers, the Court of Appeals through two Divisions[71] rendered decisions affirming the judgments of the Quezon City courts. The decisions of the Court of Appeals in turn were brought up to this Court. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals granted the petition for annulment of judgment.[72] The decision was also elevated to this Court. After the consolidation of the petitions, this Court rendered the Liao decision.
	GR Nos. 102961-62 2000-01-27	JESUS P. LIAO v. CA I. C. CRUZ CONSTRUCTION PARDO, J.
On March 28, 1990, I.C. Cruz Construction, Inc. (ICC) filed with the Court of Appeals[10] a petition for the annulment of the Order dated June 30, 1986 of the Regional Trial Court, Quezon City.[11] I.C. Cruz alleged that the title issued by the Register of Deeds of Quezon City pursuant to said order encompassed property which had been registered and titled in its name under TCT No. 836975.
	GR Nos. 102961-62 2000-01-27	JESUS P. LIAO v. CA I. C. CRUZ CONSTRUCTION PARDO, J.
On appeal by petitioner to the Court of Appeals, on October 23, 1992, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on two grounds. First, the decision of the trial court which authorized the issuance to Estrella Mapa of TCT No. 348292 had lost its force when the Court of Appeals declared it null and void in its decision promulgated on August 29, 1991.[20] Second, the July 24, 1990 decision of the trial court was a valid decision, which the Court of Appeals found no reason to disturb.[21]