This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2001-08-15 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Dwelling was correctly appreciated as an aggravating circumstance because of the sanctity that the law accords to the privacy of the human abode.[109] The home is considered a sacred place to its owners, and one who goes to another house to slander or hurt him, or do him wrong, more guilty than he who offends him elsewhere.[110] However, evident premeditation is inherent in robbery and should not have been considered against the accused.[111] Treachery could only be appreciated in crimes against persons,[112] the same way with disregard of respect due to sex and age which can be considered only in cases of crimes against persons and honor.[113] | |||||