You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

SATURINO DAVID v. SIMEON RAMOS

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 157498
2005-07-15
FILIPINO METALS CORPORATION v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE
QUISUMBING, J.
Verily, as early as Churchill and Tait v. Rafferty,[10] the Court rejected judicial control over collection of taxes. That taxes must be collected promptly is a policy deeply entrenched in our tax system. Thus, no court is allowed to grant injunction to restrain the collection of any internal revenue tax.[11]