This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-02-18 |
ABAD, J. |
||||
| Besides, a client's engagement of an ethical hacker requires an agreement between them as to the extent of the search, the methods to be used, and the systems to be tested. This is referred to as the "get out of jail free card."[6] Since the ethical hacker does his job with prior permission from the client, such permission would insulate him from the coverage of Section 4(a)(1). | |||||
|
2004-02-03 |
TINGA, J, |
||||
| Petitioners in G.R. No. 159103 (SJS Officers/Members v. Hon. Executive Secretary, et al.) are officers/members of the Social Justice Society (SJS), "Filipino citizens, taxpayers, law professors and bar reviewers."[5] Like Sanlakas and PM, they claim that Section 18, Article VII of the Constitution does not authorize the declaration of a state of rebellion.[6] They contend that the declaration is a "constitutional anomaly" that "confuses, confounds and misleads" because "[o]verzealous public officers, acting pursuant to such proclamation or general order, are liable to violate the constitutional right of private citizens."[7] Petitioners also submit that the proclamation is a circumvention of the report requirement under the same Section 18, Article VII, commanding the President to submit a report to Congress within 48 hours from the proclamation of martial law.[8] Finally, they contend that the presidential issuances cannot be construed as an exercise of emergency powers as Congress has not delegated any such power to the President.[9] | |||||