This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2000-10-02 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Once the discharge is ordered, any future development showing that any, or all, of the five conditions have not been actually fulfilled, may not affect the legal consequences of the discharge,[65] and the admissibility and credibility of his testimony if otherwise admissible and credible.[66] Any witting or unwitting error of the prosecution in asking for the discharge, and of the court granting the petition, no question of jurisdiction being involved, cannot deprive the discharged accused of the acquittal provided by the Rules,[67] and of the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy.[68] | |||||