This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-04-27 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| As early as 1957, this Court has frowned on the act of contracting a second marriage while the first marriage was still in place as being contrary to honesty, justice, decency and morality.[28] | |||||
|
2004-09-15 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Undoubtedly, respondent's act constitutes grossly immoral conduct, a ground for disbarment under Section 27, Rule 138 of the Revised Rules of Court. He exhibited a deplorable lack of that degree of morality required of him as a member of the Bar. In particular, he made a mockery of marriage which is a sacred institution demanding respect and dignity. His act of contracting a second marriage is contrary to honesty, justice, decency and morality.[23] | |||||