This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-11-27 |
PEREZ, J. |
||||
| Rather than remanding this case to the Court of Appeals, however, this Court chooses to herein resolve petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. In doing so, We only exercise a procedural policy, already established by a catena of decided cases[87] no less, that empowers this Court to bring final resolution to a case when it could, instead of remanding it and allowing it to "bear the seeds of future litigation."[88] After all, the voluminous documentary evidence existing in the records of this case already affords this Court with more than enough foundation to make a ruling on the merits. Undoubtedly, the ends of justice as well as the interest of all parties would be better served, if this otherwise protracted case can be brought to its conclusion without any further delay. | |||||