Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 143591 2010-05-05	TEODORO C. BORLONGAN v. MAGDALENO M. PEÑA PEREZ, J.
An arrest without a probable cause is an unreasonable seizure of a person, and violates the privacy of persons which ought not to be intruded by the State.[36]
	GR NO. 168306 2007-06-19	WILLIAM C. YAO v. PEOPLE CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Further, it is apparent that the motor compressor, LPG refilling machine and the GASUL and SHELL LPG cylinders seized were the corpus delicti, the body or substance of the crime, or the evidence of the commission of trademark infringement. These were the very instruments used or intended to be used by the petitioners in trademark infringement. It is possible that, if returned to MASAGANA, these items will be used again in violating the intellectual property rights of Petron and Pilipinas Shell.[49] Thus, the RTC was justified in denying the petitioners' motion for their return so as to prevent the petitioners and/or MASAGANA from using them again in trademark infringement.