This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-05-21 |
PUNO, C.J. |
||||
| We find that these articles are inapplicable to the case at bar. In order that mistake may invalidate consent and constitute a ground for annulment of contract based on Article 1331, the mistake must be material as to go to the essence of the contract; that without such mistake, the agreement would not have been made.[31] The effect of error must be determined largely by its influence upon the party. If the party would have entered into the contract even if he had knowledge of the true fact, then the error does not vitiate consent.[32] | |||||