This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2016-02-03 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| Finally, there is no merit in the petitioner's argument that the previous order setting the case for probate barred the RTC from ordering the case to proceed intestate. The disputed order is merely interlocutory and can never become final and executory in the same manner that a final judgment does.[13] An interlocutory order does not result in res judicata.[14] It remains under the control of the court and can be modified or rescinded at any time before final judgment.[15] | |||||