This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-11-19 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| In 1915, the Court reiterated this doctrine in Camo v. Boyco.[25] It was written therein that no presumption of the regularity existed in any administrative action which resulted in depriving a citizen or taxpayer of his property. It further stated that on the contrary, the due process of law to be followed in tax proceedings must be established by proof and the general rule was that the purchaser of a tax title was bound to take upon himself the burden of showing the regularity of all proceedings leading up to the sale. | |||||